Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fright Show (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify to allow time for improvements. RL0919 (talk) 17:34, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fright Show

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undeleted without improvement. Dronebogus (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a BEFORE to show notability. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:44, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This article was undeleted because the previous AFD was closed as a soft delete which meant the deletion was treated as a PROD and could be restored upon editor request. And it was just restored today so there hasn't been much time to improve the article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- In my view you either are ready and prepared to improve the article or you don’t request undeletion. Anything else is just trying to override consensus with an appeal to pity. Dronebogus (talk) 09:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in this case, it wasn't pity but policy. I am surprised that the page creator hasn't commented here yet. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify Give them time to improve it, if they move it to mainspace before it's ready, then we can come back here. Mako001 (C) (T) _{^{(The Alternate Mako)}} 07:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I support that Dronebogus (talk) 11:18, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify per above, to allow for improvements (if they are at all possible) Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 13:09, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify, i agree to give them a chance to improve the article. Alex-h (talk) 15:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.