Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuat Ergin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Fuat Ergin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article simply announces the rapper's existence and makes no statement of notability. This is probably because he has received almost no significant and reliable media coverage, and is only visible in the standard retail and streaming databases. The same is true of his various alternate stage names. None of his albums have reliable or informative reviews either, and are themselves only available at the standard retail and streaming sites. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Keep These all seem like reliable sources for me: Sözcü [1], Milliyet [2], Hürriyet [3], Cumhuriyet [4], Radikal [5]. ~Styyx ^{Talk? ^-^} 09:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Nominator - Just because the publication (newspaper) is notable, this does not guarantee that the article about the person under discussion is significant or helps with notability. Of the five newspaper articles listed: #1 and #4 are possibly useful for info about the rapper's history, but they are softball introductory interviews. #2 is nothing but a brief promotional announcement. #3 is a brief notice about the guy's wedding. #5 is a PR piece about an upcoming album. In my view, none of those satisfy the significant coverage requirement for this musician despite being reliable publications otherwise. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Notable and what Styyx said. Omniscientmoose42 (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Styyx. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 18:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly notable and well-covered per Styyx's sources. Plus there is likely even more out there that was not listed here.--Seacactus 13 (talk) 22:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.