Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuchs Fine Guns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fuchs Fine Guns

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Few independent, reliable sources which give WP:SIGCOV can be found. DrStrauss talk 16:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Given the article's claim that the double barrel repeater is there most notable gun, I find little information about them. Here's an article I found. http://www.range365.com/double-barrel-bolt-action-rifle#page-2 While I haven't found enough to justify the article yet, I don't know anything about guns and comment here to prod others who know guns to check for articles in magazines, etc. Ross-c (talk) 17:48, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:47, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:SPIP and GNG. References fail WP:ORGIND, are promotional or rely on company material and are not independent. -- HighKing⁺⁺15:00, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.