Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun Fair Positive Soccer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow delete. Geschichte (talk) 03:54, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fun Fair Positive Soccer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article created by an WP:SPA. All coverage is trivial and/or promotional:

[1] advert
[2] advert
[3] directory listing
[4] directory listing Spiderone 09:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 09:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 10:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG, borderline promotional. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Nigej (talk) 20:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This fails WP:GNG, and is pure promotional. Pahiy (talk) 01:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - run of the mill soccer league. Bearian (talk) 18:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only source is the mission statement on the website. Only seems fun, fair, and positive to delete it. Copyrightpower1337 (talk) 20:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺16:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.