Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G-Core Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G-Core Labs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

De-prodded without rationale, original PROD rationale was "Most of the coverage has been on one of their products, G-CDN, which may meet WP:NPRODUCT, but I am not seeing sufficient WP:CORPDEPTH for G-Core Labs itself." SITH (talk) 10:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, insufficient in-depth coverage in reliable sources to satisfy WP:NCORP. The Guinness record might be a claim to fame, except that it doesn't mention this company at all; the claim that the company was involved in it is sourced only to one of its own press-releases ("Our content delivery network is the fastest and leading in Russia") which anyway does not make any mention of Wargaming or World of Tanks. This is also undisclosed paid editing in violation of our Terms of Use – Esknyazeva has made no secret of his/her connection to the company (here, for example: "added big customers of our company with proof links to reliable sources"), but has made no appropriate paid-editor disclosure. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:21, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.