Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GIBSS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 05:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GIBSS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear advertising in which policy WP:NOT applies since everything is literally PR advertising and it's clear in the blatant consistency shown here, and what searches found were naturally only PR advertising since we've established these publications so notoriously publish company advertising, we cannot begin to conceivably accept it as such. Another concerning sign is that this was actually accepted a year ago and yet there was then, as is now, the sheer blatancy of company-involved advertising hence this is deletion. SwisterTwister talk 17:00, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is borderline promotional. No sources I could find online to substantiate notability of the subject. $Tushi Talk To Me$ 10:45, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - can't see any evidence of notability Spiderone 18:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.