Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNUnify

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Symbiosis Institute of Computer Studies and Research. Go for it! SarahStierch (talk) 01:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GNUnify (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable event? Most of the sources are blogs or primary ViperSnake151  Talk  22:14, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:50, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:50, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:50, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to GNU Symbiosis Institute of Computer Studies and Research or delete. I can't see any kind of coverage in reliable sources. Not even Slashdot has reported on it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It is one of the important articles about the event which gets held every year in Pune. It is notable in my opinion. There is lot of secondary source coverage as well in the well known newspapers. Thanks. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 06:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• So why doesn't the article use them? In my opinion, the presence of sources in the article is more important than the claim that they exist. Also, notability is not in your opinion, there is a specific guideline. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:34, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Symbiosis Institute of Computer Studies and Research - merging to GNU probably doesn't make sense, since this event is not officially GNU-related in any way; but the SICSR article already has a section on GNUnify. Yaron K. (talk) 12:56, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, sounds good to me. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:42, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.