Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GP Rider

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:36, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GP Rider (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't cite any references. Delete it per WP:V and WP:GNG. Supdiop (T🔹C) 09:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  09:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Being unreferenced is not a criteria for deletion, unless its a BLP. Seems notable enough for a video game. [1] [2]WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. As for the given deletion rationale, unsourced does not imply unsourcable. From sources I can find HCG101 looks good. Above linked Sega Nerds is unreliable as per WP:VG/RS. There's a short blurb in Retro Gamer #77. I can't find any other sources with significant content to satisfy WP:GNG with multiple reliable sources. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 18:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per added sources that add up to multiple in-depth secondary reliable sources for WP:GNG. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 15:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Magazine reference seems adequate for notability, though more would be preferable. Deltasim (talk) 13:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New magazine source added; CVG classified as a notable one. Deltasim (talk) 12:16, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep In addition to what has already been provided, Allgame have a synopsis and review, German magazine Video Games has a review. --The1337gamer (talk) 10:16, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.