Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GREedge
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
GREedge
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- GREedge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet criteria for WP:N, citing no notable or even recent news sources. Transmissionelement (talk) 17:50, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG by a mile. There is nothing I can find that is in-depth. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Basically advertising, not notable at an encyclopedic level. bd2412 T 19:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.