Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gacha (apps)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gacha (apps) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable article. I did a search and looked at the news section Goggle gave me. The only reliable source here is thecinemaholic.com. The Player.One is not reliable, and Greeks Nation looks like a blog more than a news source. A former cation is HITC, which me and Grayfell removed because it was biased. 🍓⋆JennilyW♡🍧 (talk) 22:50, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. 🍓⋆JennilyW♡🍧 (talk) 22:50, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I would also like to mention that a lot of the refs there aren't reliable or notable. 🍓⋆JennilyW♡🍧 (talk) 22:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom, I couldn't find any reliable sources either. Vukky, a real human 👀 (talk to me!) 07:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, reliable sources are not available to qualify GNG. Jaysonsands (talk) 10:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because it's stupid and useless. I tried fixing it, but I give up. It will never be fixed. Also, users keep adding Fancruft. —ÐW^(T·C) 21:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for now - The name is generic enough to cause a lot of false positives when searching, but I still couldn't find enough to prop this up. Both mobile apps and software made for younger users are areas that often have lackluster coverage. This issue isn't a problem Wikipedia can solve. The number of downloads and related videos suggest there is something here, but since sources haven't apparently caught up yet, not much that we can do. Grayfell (talk) 23:50, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Grayfell. The only game I can foresee meeting WP:GNG in the future is Gacha Life, as that is pretty indisputably popular. Everything else, bar perhaps Gacha Club, seems to be non-notable by all accounts beyond just our own standards. We certainly don't need a catch-all article for it. --Velvetune! t • c 01:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. There are some sources on the concept of gachas but not this particular series. IceWelder [✉] 12:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No significant Coverage found and not pass general notability guidelines. TheDreamBoat (talk) 23:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no evidence this meets GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.