Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gadk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Moves can be discussed via WP:RM. (non-admin closure) J947^{( c ) (m)} 04:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gadk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source search suggests that the club fails club notability standards. Ineligible for speedy as it makes a credible claim of significance. DrStrauss talk 18:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep (probably) The search reported above was run on the abbreviated name only: a search on the full name of the club (Göteborgs amatördykarklubb) shows quite a nnumber of newspaper articles in Swedish--I have not yet tried to read them, but there is a sufficient number to make it likely that the club is notable . DGG ( talk ) 01:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: the newspaper articles I've encountered doing a similar search, when translated, do not give significant coverage and are passing mentions only. DrStrauss talk 10:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep - per search for sources. It pops up several. Low article quality but no reason for deletion. BabbaQ (talk) 23:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename to Göteborgs amatördykarklubb. Desperately needs cleanup. Their primary website looks to be [1], not [2]. The Swedish Wikipedia does not appear to have an article on this. Gadk is an acronym that appears to mostly be their domain name rather than their common name. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.