Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gajendra Verma (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 02:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gajendra Verma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sole possible claim to notability appears to be a single incident with minor coverage. Does not demonstrably meet any other notability criteria listed at WP:MUSIC. Article was previously subject to an AfD that concluded with a "soft delete". - Vianello (Talk) 11:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 18:04, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 18:04, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No way is this person notable. andy (talk) 22:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. To those commenting about the notability, have a look: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] which fits WP:MUSBIO. Mr RD (talk) 14:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gajendra Verma (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.