Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamvas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gamvas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources or apparent notability. As seen by GB fan, Odie5533 and Dgpop both tried to PROD the article in 2016, but these were disputed by creator God64 and 78.69.249.162. IgelRM (talk) 23:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No claim of notability. Owen× ☎ 23:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:18, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can't find in-depth coverage in reliable sources Polyamorph (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.