Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garsonuiskoe mine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:51, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Garsonuiskoe mine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Russian mine that fails WP:GNG. I was unable to find any sources. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 20:37, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 20:37, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:26, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Couldn't find the mine mentioned anywhere except the single source used in the article, which doesn't contribute to notability. All pages in Category:Fluorite mines in Russia should possibly be under consideration, as they are all similarly single-sentence articles that cite a single source. -Samoht27 (talk) 19:52, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.