Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Agarwal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gaurav Agarwal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could only find one source on google that could be used in the article. I dream of horses (T) @ 22:14, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: Apart from a journalist complaining about the subject's salary, I can't find any significant coverage, but there are a lot of mentions and two-sentence details on the subject, which may indicate notability. Esquivalience ^t 23:33, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:07, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and fails to state a reason the subject should be considered notable in lieu of sources. The one source offered is clearly primary and unhelpful. Msnicki (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG. No indication of importance. --Anar chyte 04:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. May be overkill, but I've bio-prodded too, Linkedin obviously isn't RS Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Obvious autobiography, and appears to fail WP:GNG. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 15:09, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.