Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Malhotra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gaurav Malhotra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have failed to find reliable sources to support this astrologer's claim of notability either on GNG or BIO. I request a discussion to decide whether this BLP should be deleted or not. Lourdes 07:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we need much better sources to establish the notability of an astrologer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Astrospeak website for which he writes the articles belongs to the reputed time of India group which is the most reputed newspaper of India. They only invite notable people to write for their website. GGN

Delete non notable astrologer ,there are several of astrologer consultants on promotional content,astrospeak is non notable website Junosoon —Preceding undated comment added 08:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Subject not notable. Appears to be promotional to me. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 04:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.