Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeekWrapped
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:28, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
GeekWrapped
- GeekWrapped (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was created by a (presumably paid) sockfarm (investigation)
After peeling away the passing mentions and promotional junk, there's very little left. They do contests and freebies with a few other companies, and some sites have published "gift-guide" type puff-pieces with/about them, but independent coverage of the company is limited to one brief Daily Dot article and one brief Gizmodo article, which are both on the flimsy side as reliable sources. Grayfell (talk) 23:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now at best as I only found some links at News and browsers, nothing to suggest a currently better article. Notifying tagger Bazj. SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as sock spam. Bazj (talk) 09:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.