Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geekography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Already deleted as a copyvio, but there is consensus for removal even without that Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geekography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent references. No evidence on Google search of independent coverage by third-party sources. Google search turns up nothing but mentions by Pantaleev. Just giving a name to something doesn't always make it notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I couldn't find any worthwhile sources out of the 86 which was all that Google could find once blogs etc excluded. No notability. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Invented by the article's creator, and does not credibly indicate why its subject is important or significant. Mduvekot (talk) 20:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as copyvio of https://exeypanteleev.com/geekography/. PamD 22:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.