Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geist Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geist Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails WP:GNG, no notability and no claim of notability. Somehow it survived for seven years. The website and Youtube channel it was about no longer exists as far as I can tell. KarlPoppery (talk) 06:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, they have one video on Youtube... ~~I've put a CSD to not waste anyone's time. KarlPoppery (talk) 06:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)~~[reply]

Note: This debate has been mentioned at User talk:Havocbean (reason: page creator). — Paleo Neonate — 06:19, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been mentioned at Talk:Geist Group. — Paleo Neonate — 06:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. — Paleo Neonate — 06:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. — Paleo Neonate — 06:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. — Paleo Neonate — 06:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — Paleo Neonate — 06:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin: If the result is delete, File:GeistGroup.jpg becomes orphan. Thanks, — Paleo Neonate — 06:59, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - Not enough material can be found to assess notability. — Paleo Neonate — 07:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Am unable to find significant coverage. There is a homonymous law group in Indiana that I see more of. Was unable to locate the cited article. In any event, that by itself would fall short. Two links seemed to be about a "ghost detector". They, of course, do not treat the subject meaningfully if at all. The youtube presence falls short as well. Plenty of G-hits to sift through. Let the search continue. "Not enough material" is a sound deletion rationale, but falls far short of "speedy deletion". Perhaps the dearth of information will lead to WP:Snow. Perhaps someone will locate coverage I have missed.Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:52, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My rational for CSD and speedy was that there isn't even a claim of signifiance. It's a group that did one non-viral video and stopped (six videos according to the article but they can't be found). KarlPoppery (talk) 16:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

<sigh /> Someone detagged. Anyway, there are G-hits to sift. Not that I expect anything. But one should be thorough. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:52, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NOTE. - LuckyLouie (talk) 12:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as badly failing WP:FRINGE. Bearian (talk) 13:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.