Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genesys (RPG)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Genesys (RPG) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination on behalf of an IP editor. Their rationale is:

Not enough WP:RS coverage (I only found blogs, forums and the game website...) to support notability. Might be WP:TOOSOON or might simply not be notable outside of niche area. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 12:26, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have no personal opinion at the moment, but of course I might put in a !vote later. Reyk _YO! 12:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The sole reference is a full quote of the game brochure. The text is bereft of other citations. The notability is nowhere. The subject is out of lives. -The Gnome (talk) 13:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I couldn't find any secondary independent sources either. Released November 2017, so possibly WP:TOOSOON. Anyhow, at the moment it fails WP:NVG. Narky Blert (talk) 14:54, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.