Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genie (programming language) (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Editors can create a Redirect from this page title if they wish. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Genie (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was deleted via AfD in 2009 but then recreated. Survived an AfD in 2019 which was quickly closed as a revenge nomination, without discussion. Sources do not provide sufficient coverage and/or are not reliable. Just another non-notable programming language (dialect). IntGrah (talk) 20:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. IntGrah (talk) 20:13, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found some sources that describe unrelated programming projects/proposals that contain the word "Genie", but nothing beyond that. This subject is not notable. HyperAccelerated (talk) 20:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Unable to find any sufficient sourcing, language is apparently dead anyways. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 18:41, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Vala - I don't see the sourcing for an independent article. But, I found at least some post-release sources to verify a single sentence in the Vala article. Suriname0 (talk) 00:07, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.