Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey Sauer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to EServer.org. Reasonable ATD. Star Mississippi 02:14, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffrey Sauer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially notable associate professor. Been on the cat:nn list since 2010. scope_creep^Talk 14:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Alabama, and Indiana. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:18, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to EServer.org. I don't see any way Sauer could pass WP:NPROF, and my search for GNG-qualifying coverage didn't find much more than a few interview-ish paragraphs here and a handful of passing mentions in the press. A redirect to the EServer article, where he's mentioned, seems like a reasonable alternative to deletion, particularly since he's occasionally referenced in EServer-related press coverage. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails GNG, NPROF, no significant coverage found.Jacona (talk) 12:49, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.