Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geography of the aging

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:22, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geography of the aging (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See WP:NOTESSAY Ethanlu121 (talk) 19:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Although the article is poorly written, see WP:AFDISNTCLEANUP . It still is notable. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 19:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Poor translation from the Spanish article, but sources look reasonable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Geographical gerontology, which, per this review article, is the discipline's accepted name. (I would not oppose a redirect.) Tigraan (talk) 11:10, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.