Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgette Alexander-Morrison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:04, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Georgette Alexander-Morrison

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that this passes our notability criteria for biographies of living persons. Sorry, its a nicely formatted stub but I don't think the subject is notable enough to warrant inclusion in the encyclopedia. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 19:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, per WP:A7. The article does not make any credible claim of significance or importance, in my opinion. ~~And the only potential claim of significance or importance, i.e. being "Senior Director, Business Development for Orbital Sciences Corporation", is not even supported by a reliable source.~~ --Edcolins (talk) 21:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would like this moved to my userspace so that I can conduct further research. StudiesWorld (talk) 23:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)"[reply]
- This does not seem to be an option, see WP:USERFY#NO "What cannot be userfied": 4. "Articles for which an AfD discussion is underway" --Edcolins (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - It is an option as a result of an AfD. StudiesWorld (talk) 10:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - You are right. It is an option if all participants agree. I don't agree to userfy this one. In my opinion, the content is not worth keeping. It seems to have no potential to be useful at any point in time. --Edcolins (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BIO. Her page in Women of Goddard shows her to be a mid-level manager, nothing more. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:01, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The booklet published by her employer is in-depth and reliable, but I think too close to the subject to add to notability, and in any case it's only one source and WP:GNG asks for multiple sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "senior directors" at such institutions are really run of the mill. Bearian (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.