Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germany's Next Top Model (cycle 10)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 15:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Germany's Next Top Model (cycle 10)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a future season of a television program. Insufficient sources are available to meet WP:GNG. Also fails WP:NOTTVGUIDE. - Mr X 14:05, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Nwlaw63 (talk) 17:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: If it's unsourced, then find some sources. It's not unsourced at present, anyway. Seeing that it's now on air on ProSieben, the argument about it being a "future season" is invalid and for any other arguments, you'd have to make some big issues out of the related articles: Germany's Next Topmodel (cycle 1), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. It's logical to have an article for cycle 10, even before it has started to air, so long that it has been confirmed. And as far as I'm aware, this season was confirmed some time last year when they began filming... Jared Preston (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The season started airing. So keep. Let's close this debate asap. Zuckerberg (talk) 00:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Bobherry talk 01:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bobherry: Perhaps you'd like to give specific rationale for your opinion. AFD is not a vote. --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 04:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mix of what the others said; Its a future season but you can find sources. Bobherry talk 04:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.