Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghofeyleh prayers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 02:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ghofeyleh prayers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem supported by any reliable sources. No results on Google Books or Google Scholar. Only 27 results of low quality on Google web search. Anders Feder (talk) 01:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New References added But Mafatih al-Janan book is an authoritative source. Felestin1714 (Felestin1714) 18:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 16:04, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now unless it can be improved because if not, we'll wait for a better article later. SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article is from reliable References.Article should not be removed. Felestin1714 talk 21:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:13, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:31, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I cannot read the sources, but the article makes sense, despite the poor English. If verified, it would be notable. DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because its significance can't be evaluated because the content is unintelligible. If this is a notable topic, the article would need to be rewritten from scratch by somebody who can write understandable English sentences. Sandstein 22:08, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.