Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Front (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost Front

Ghost Front (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged as possibly non-notable since September 2008. It was previously brought to AfD over a year ago but closed as no consensus because no one else commented. Of the 7 references in the article, four are from low quality blogs, one is from the band's possibly defunct myspace page, one is a Facebook page, another is a video, and the NY Daily News article barely mentions the band. My searches turned up no reliable sources. FuriouslySerene (talk) 03:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Front (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.