Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Hunt Weekends

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:47, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost Hunt Weekends (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a Ghost Hunting company. Before is difficult to carry out because of the generic name. All but one of the refs in the article are dead. Having visited their own website the company appears to be small and non notable. The article was created by a SPA and has been tagged COI and Advert since 2013. Desertarun (talk) 09:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Not seeing enough to pass WP:NCORP. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 12:24, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Created by a SPA and pretty much ignored since 2013 let it go. Sgerbic (talk) 22:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.