Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibson's Donuts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 22:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gibson's Donuts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Donut shop in Memphis that has a fair bit of local coverage but I don’t think passes WP:NCORP. Mccapra (talk) 19:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 19:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 19:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:32, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I don't think it is fair to call several televised coverages "local coverage" The articles referenced claims, clearly meet "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Jeepday (talk) 15:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No Michelin or similar awards, coverage in local media only is IMHO not enough to meet NORG/GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:41, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete References do not meet the criteria for establishing notability. The first reference is a review of the owner's book about the shop - which I note is used as a reference for some of the "facts" within the article. Other references are advertorials or reviews in local publications. Topic fails notability as per NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.