Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gideon Hillman Consulting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gideon Hillman Consulting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable consulting logistics company , Fails NCORP & GNG –Davey2010^Talk 00:20, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable corporation.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Subject lacks notability and coverage in independent reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 01:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable electronics company. Accredited? Yes. Notable? No. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH due to a lack of coverage.--SamHolt6 (talk) 03:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability guidelines. Hrodvarsson (talk) 20:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.