Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gifa inc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 20:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gifa inc

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

concern = no indication of notability. While references are given they are purely WP:ROUTINE noq (talk) 10:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA posting of an article previously rejected at AfC. The article describes the financial transactions around the company and its business proposition, supported by routine announcement coverage and blog posts, with no claim of notability. Nor are searches finding better than more of the same and penny stock speculation: fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 10:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 12:33, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:16, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NCORP; not vsure what the article is actually about. Should have failed as AFC. Sbalfour (talk) 23:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.