Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl math

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Owen× ☎ 20:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Girl math (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage is not sustained. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 18:49, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Cuñado ☼ - Talk 19:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics, Mathematics, and Psychology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep GNG is satisfied with multiple reliable sources covering, and Sustained with sources from both 2023 and 2024. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 22:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: It's also got some cultural traction when a local sports team created an ad that didn't quite "ht" as planned [1], and basic explanations of the phenomena [2], [3]. The phrase having cultural traction is a good indication of notability. Oaktree b (talk) 00:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: And some journal articles for good measure [4], [5]. Oaktree b (talk) 00:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: It's also been covered in European/French media [6] [7], [8]. Oaktree b (talk) 00:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sources listed above and those in the article demonstrate that it passes WP:GNG. McYeee (talk) 22:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Oaktree b. Meme pages may seem a bit daft, but where they are notable they are notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 06:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The coverage is continuing, so is sustained. While I have vast reservations about the meme itself at many levels, via WP:NPOV that is irrelevant. Ldm1954 (talk) 11:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.