Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giuseppe Prinzi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and salt. Could have been speedied under G4. --MelanieN (talk) 19:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Giuseppe Prinzi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Non-notable artist. SPA-recreation of a deleted article without significant new coverage. Probably need WP:SALT due to recent promotional activity (see last AfD comments). GermanJoe (talk) 11:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I restored the AFD template so that this discussion can continue. EricEnfermero (Talk) 12:50, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as recreation of previously AfD material. -- Mikeblas (talk) 13:17, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt.--Rpclod (talk) 15:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think it's an author interesting and potentially very encyclopedic --Miloslink (talk) 10:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)— Miloslink (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
KeepAs honestly have to say, the candidate is sufficiently encyclopedic, I do not see the purpose of promotion --Lallpok (talk) 10:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)— Lallpok (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Speedy delete as G4, and salt. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Content of the biography a little indefinite, but the sources are there and the page can be improved --Anvidejeres (talk) 10:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)— Anvidejeres (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep I am in favour of maintaining voice, meanwhile, would add a good source --> http://www.ilcieloditalia.it/?cat=20 --Ferlitt (talk) 17:06, 28 June 2015 (UTC)Struck out confirmed sockpuppets' comments --JAaron95 ^Talk 13:38, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing administrator. The new accounts who've voted here are Confirmed sock puppets. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Libiolibiobot.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a tad reluctantly, as the work seems of decent quality & he has clearly been around a while. But the article is apparently by Google translate, & none of the refs demonstrate meeting WP:ARTIST. No Italian article - was that deleted? Johnbod (talk) 01:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was, Johnbod, here's the deletion discussion [1] Apparently previously created under different names and speedy deleted multiple times. Also deleted on the French Wikipedia after discussion[2] --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! We should follow them. Johnbod (talk) 13:02, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.