Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoLeanSixSigma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:41, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GoLeanSixSigma

GoLeanSixSigma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverage by reliable third party sources. I find some mentions in press releases, but little else. Doesn't appear to pass WP:CORP. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 17:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don't find any strong third-party sources. They are active across social media, but the only article I found about them is from a blog. This seems odd because they seem to have accounts at some public universities, so I would expect to find more. LaMona (talk) 00:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoLeanSixSigma, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.