Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God's Stuff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

God's Stuff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable children's book or books. Five editions are listed (without any independent source) in our article, but only three of them are in WorldCat. The English edition is held in two libraries worldwide, the French edition in one. For what little it's worth, the English edition is ranked "#12,909,065 in Books" on amazon.com. This is unambiguous (but undeclared) promotion; the article creator claims here to be the husband of the author. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:44, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: According to WorldCat, this is the only book that Stirling Stream (Mauritius) has ever published. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:57, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no question. Deb (talk) 18:13, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:38, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no notably NZFC^(talk) 18:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable. Sounds like a book about PCP and meth. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for above reasons. Lacks sourcing. Nothing found in a Google Books search.104.163.148.25 (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If it's an apparent self-publication, then that's all we need. Minimal distribution and discovery of COI of editor also presents significant problems. On review, this does appear to be merely promotional content, or at a minimum WP:TOOSOON. Montanabw^(talk) 19:21, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it's a delete, but, with respect, COI and promotion are not reasons for deletion on its own.104.163.148.25 (talk) 22:13, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly a promotional article on a non-notable subject that does not meet Wikipedia's threshold for inclusion. SunChaser (talk) 08:55, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.