Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gojo (character)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gojo (character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been unsourced since 2023, all the Raj-specific sources I could find are unreliable, and people searching this are more likely looking for Satoru (which, to be fair, IS hatnoted but still). I know this because this article has gotten 433 pageviews in the past 30 days BUT the article on Satoru alone has gotten 15,160 in the past 10 User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 10:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Comics and animation, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Raj Comics, I think there could be a short description of the character there. Honestly that article needs work too but I can't read enough of the hindi sources to do it. Moritoriko (talk)

On second thought, if most of the views are trying to find Gojo Satoru then a redirect will only be more confusing. I am open to being convinced. Moritoriko (talk) 04:47, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After thinking it over and looking at the pages I think the article should be renamed to Gojo (Raj Comics) and that should be redirected to Raj Comics I think the current article name is too vague as we can see at the disambiguation page where there are 3 characters (partially) named Gojo. Moritoriko (talk) 23:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It could be a redirect to the disambiguation page Gojō, where the character wasn't listed until just now. -- Reconrabbit 16:45, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect to where?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:24, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Raj Comics per above. Editors can continue the discussion outside AFD about whether there's a better target, such as a disambiguation page. The article doesn't have enough sources to met most of our policies. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:41, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: While we have eyes on this, I would like opinions on this website as a source. Moritoriko (talk) 00:01, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Raj_Comics#Characters_based_in_ancient_times. This will be better redirect to as it takes directly to the character where it is mentioned. RangersRus (talk) 13:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Raj Comics per above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:25, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.