Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Knight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Knight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable video game, gameplay section reads a bit like a tutorial?   Kadzi   (talk) 11:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.   Kadzi   (talk) 11:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. WP:VGSE drags up nothing, and there are actually many tongue-in-cheek references to various departing "Knights". All besides the King's Quest chapter. --Izno (talk) 16:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:04, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2020-06✍️ create

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.