Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gopakumar.R

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gopakumar.R (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist who fails WP:ARTIST, WP:ANYBIO, WP:SIGCOV. Citations in the article are only some passing mention. Google search doesn't provide anything better. RationalPuff (talk) 16:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 16:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 16:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 16:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 16:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete lacks sigcov. Possibly (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NARTIST. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This artist does not meet our criteria for inclusion; does not pass WP:GNG, nor WP:NARTIST. I could not find any sigcov in RS's when doing a BEFORE search. Netherzone (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. — Alalch Emis (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.