Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Duthie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 21:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Duthie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable musician, former references are old and broken / unavailable (are also press release / self driven) and no significant media coverage since article creation. Does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (music) Criteria for musicians and ensembles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C75:4F00:5163:2D53:93A:629A (talk) 15:17, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Note IP requested AfD in WT:AFD. I am neutral in this AfD Hhkohh (talk) 15:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 16:34, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 16:34, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep this nomination is a result of a content dispute where the floating ip keeps trying to remove most of the content which they did again just before this nomination so this qualifies for WP:SPEEDYKEEP criteria 2d.

• The article should not be slashed or deleted because the references are old or broken, they can be fixed using the internet archive and archive is. Of the working refs there is reliable sources coverage such as SCTV and several newspapers, passes WP:GNG, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:02, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• All of the references in the article are working now such as altsounds, new reviews etc Atlantic306 (talk) 18:17, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep per Atlantic306. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:22, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep per above discussion. Skirts89 (talk) 18:59, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep — The IPs nomination was not done in good faith.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:11, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.