Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gotemba Interchange

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Tōmei Expressway. as an ATD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gotemba Interchange (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, and an interchange like this is ordinary and would likely not have any additional sources. Rschen7754 05:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Japan. Rschen7754 05:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Nothing special about this interchange to warrant an article. Dough4872 09:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This interchange does not warrant an article. It is rather amusing to me that this article has even existed for a normal interchange. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is a run of the mill interchange with no encyclopedic significance. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 13:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. There doesn't appear to be anything notable about this particular road feature. Bensci54 (talk) 16:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Tōmei Expressway. The interchange is on the Tōmei Expressway and mentioned in its article. The AfDd article has been around since 2014! Hence WP:ATD and WP:CHEAP very much apply and take preference over any delete suggestions. gidonb (talk) 22:55, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Tōmei Expressway: redirects are WP:CHEAP and preserve the page history better. There is a suitable target and this is therefore a good ATD. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 14:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.