Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GrassBase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GrassBase (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability PoliceSheep99 (talk) 21:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose deletion The article may be a stub, but the database is the major taxonomic database for grasses, one of the most economically important groups of plants, for amenity, fodder, human food, etc. Peter coxhead (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As the article says, this is "one of the two largest databases of plants in the world". We also have over a thousand other articles linking to it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Andy Mabbett and Peter coxhead: notability and number of articles linking to it. Pagliaccious (talk) 14:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.