Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great baths

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:31, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great baths (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet criteria for a dab page. Besides all the formatting/linking issues, it does not disambiguate multiple titles of the same name. Other Roman baths are can be called "great baths" using great as an adjective, but the other entries do not refer to places by that name. MB 14:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. MB 14:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are two "Great Bath"s. There is the one at Mohenjo-daro, and the one at the Roman Baths (Bath). In addition there is the "Great Bath" at Lechaion Road, although reading the source suggests there wasn't a large pool called a "Great Bath" like the other two pools, which is why I wrote "Great Bath(s)". I moved Great Bath, Mohenjo-daro to Great Bath without realizing the pool at the Roman Baths in Bath was also called a "Great Bath" and is actually larger than the Mohenjo-daro one. Instead of moving Great Bath back to Great Bath, Mohenjo-daro, I figured this was better. LightProof1995 (talk) 14:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've found another "Great Bath(s)" at Dion, Pieria, and added that to the list. LightProof1995 (talk) 15:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Seems like an effort to justify a disambiguation page for something that definitely doesn't need one Dexxtrall (talk) 21:48, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  It was at first but I truly feel I have found enough "Great Baths" to warrant this not being deleted. LightProof1995 (talk) 11:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I reverted cut & paste moves which had the effect of moving material from Great baths to Great Baths. @LightProof1995: should not use cut & paste to move pages – use WP:RM to move pages properly – and it's unhelpful to commenters here to move titles that are under discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I think any ambiguity can be handled with hatnotes. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:18, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.