Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Growth recession

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus. Sources have not been refuted. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Growth recession (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can’t find more than a handful of refs for use of this neologism and most seem to derived from this article. I don’t think this term is notable. Mccapra (talk) 06:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Pontificalibus 07:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I see multiple uses, some of which pre-date this article. See: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].Icewhiz (talk) 15:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Not a fan of the way this article is written, but the term is used in capital markets. Even Investopedia has an article on the term [11]. Britishfinance (talk) 22:31, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the sources indicated by Icewhiz - notability clearly demonstrated Nosebagbear (talk) 14:57, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.