Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guardian (database)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Federal Bureau of Investigation. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guardian (database) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Federal Bureau of Investigation, where the information is already covered. Database, one of likely hundreds that the FBI uses, is not notable on its own and is better covered on the agency's page. Longhornsg (talk) 00:43, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Military, Politics, Terrorism, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 00:43, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom. C F A 💬 23:08, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 01:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not all the information related to the Guardian has been included in the FBI article. I suggest creating a new section specifically the Guardian inside that article or adding this information to the existing eGuardian section, before removing this article.

This is one of my first contributions, please let me know if and how I messed up. VicenteGarzaReyna (talk) 21:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.