Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunjan Sharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gunjan Sharma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still confirm my PROD which motioned and emphasized having one simple local "bravery" award and having another named after her, is quite trivial and unconvincing, and it goes to state the same for Americans, because the listed sources themselves are simply trivial and unconvincing, nothing amounting to actual substance. The history also speaks for itself in that there's literally nothing else aside from this one award, which is a state award, not a major award. SwisterTwister talk 02:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the references show that WP:GNG is passed for a notable act of bravery which is one event, the other event is having a bravery award named after her, a state award is still notable. Atlantic306 (talk) 02:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete getting an award for being a brave teenager is not enough to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Also this is a single-event popularity. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:21, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is totally the case of WP:BIO1E. Getting an award named after own name is kind of significant achievement but still it is one-event. The event itself is not notable. Anup [Talk] 14:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.