Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HAL Combat Air Teaming System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I do not see a consensus to delete or enough doubt to justify a no consensus close, and WP:DINC, and the article does appear to have enough material sourced to independent sources. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HAL Combat Air Teaming System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marketing term for a group of products that does not yet exist. Perhaps redirecting to Hindustan Aeronautics Limited is an option? MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 22:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge : Merge with HAL article. -AppuduPappudu (talk) 11:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Wait : The topic has been quite nicely covered and I actually can turn it into a good article soon. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 16:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further, since the group of products and rather a part of system which operates these aircrafts, at least "marketing" issues don't exist here. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 18:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am comfortable with saying that the existing coverage easily passes WP:GNG. The topic is notable on its own. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 17:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Per significant coverage as an independent subject at [1][2] and others. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 06:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Just a marketing idea or concept to gain funding could be covered in a few lines in the HAL article until something concrete comes out of the ideas. MilborneOne (talk) 15:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes WP:GNG. Whether it is a fully developed item or not, the article will have to be created anyway. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 16:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Acceptable as per. WP:GNG. More of an under development aircraft system, far from being an advertisement at least. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 11:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Given Hindustan Aeronautics Limited a government undertaking, and this teaming system seems to have sufficient coverage satisfying WP:SIGCOV and considerable material for an Article. Chirota (talk) 10:34, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.