Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HICC Pet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HICC Pet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NCORP - sourced to press releases and advertorials.

• Note: Initially a redirect, seeking consensus for deletion/restoration of the redirect.-KH-1 (talk) 01:24, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: If the page isn't kept, it should be deleted, and HICC should get redirected to Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:46, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, do not redirect: Per nom; clearly non-notable pet supply company. I was unable to find any independent coverage. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:51, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Companies, and Washington. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:39, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.