Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HP Operations Manager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HP Operations Manager

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tagged this article a year ago for possible lack of notability. I cannot see a claim of notability in the article and some of the links are not reliable. I am not honestly sure if it meets WP:NSOFT - it may possibly meet the point about "multiple printed third-party manuals". Tacyarg (talk) 17:53, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meant to add that I have looked for other coverage and not found it. Tacyarg (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 08:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't meet WP:GNG, as there is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Note that WP:NSOFT is an essay and not a guideline. — Newslinger talk 10:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.