Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hacksurance (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cyber-Insurance. As noted, that "it will get more important soon" is not a sufficient reason for keeping an article - Special:PredictFuture is not enabled on enWikipedia and hence Wikipedia is not a crystall ball. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hacksurance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Term doesn't even appear in any of the included references except the first. Delete per WP:NEOLOGISM. KDS4444 ^(talk) 00:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - redirect to Cyber-Insurance. Hacksurance is just a portmanteau with little to no credible or popular usage. It is just another term for hacking insurance, which seems to just be a type of Cyber Insurance. No reason for this article to exist. (though for the record the Cyber Insurance article itself needs work, but that's irrelevant). ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:41, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Future = Hacksurance is a term referred to Hacking Insurance. Hacking insurance is different than cyber insurance and should not be merged within cyber insurance. Hacking and Reputation Insurance are sub-parts of cyber insurance but should be referred as completely different in reference to future. This page will be expanded and explained in brief with hack attacks ( history ) section, Hacking Insurance Market, Future scope and current work in expanded manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anny1112 (talk • contribs) 06:42, 12 October 2017 (UTC) — Anny1112 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Redirect - To Cyber-Insurance as there is no real usage of Hacksurance even as hacker slang. The Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 06:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Future = Its not a hacker slang but a term for hacking insurance. A request to keep it as a different pages as the scope of usage is going to increase very soon. Hacking Insurance should be described different as compared to cyber insurance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anny1112 (talk • contribs) 22:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC) — Anny1112 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete, and anyone will then be free to create a redirect if they wish to. There is not content worth keeping in the history. No reason has been given to keep this, either as an article or as history after redirecting, except "the scope of usage is going to increase very soon", which does not even begin to comply with Wikipedia policies or guidelines: see WP:ATA#CRYSTAL and WP:CRYSTALBALL. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.