Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haian He

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haian He

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to pass WP:NACADEMICS. No reliable sources have been provided. Moreover, the article is likely to fail the GNG due to insufficient media coverage. Alex^{discussion ★} 19:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unsourced and only slim claim to notability apears to be the mathematics prizes, which do not seem that impressive. Recreation of an article speedied a couple of hours ago.TheLongTone (talk) 19:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Zero sources of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. WP:TOOSOON to have achieved notability by any of the WP:PROF standards. The student awards explicitly do not count towards that standard and also don't seem to be enough for WP:GNG. Consider salting given the history. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. Per David Eppstein. Non-notable doctoral student; h-index of 3; non-notable regional student prizes. -- 101.119.26.128 (talk) 23:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Grad students can be notable, but this one isn't... --Randykitty (talk) 14:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.